I’ve received several emails about this article in The Detroit Free Press yesterday and will try
to address it in a longer post, next week. In short, home prices are certainly on the move – especially
in higher demand areas. Why? Shadow foreclosures…
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
The Campaigns & Housing…
To follow-up on last week’s blog which addressed the soon to
expire Mortgage Debt Relief Act and the need to extend it, this week I’m taking
a look at all the housing-related issues facing both presidential candidates
and their stances, as outlined in a piece featured on Bloomberg.com this past
Wednesday.
In short, President Obama & Governor Romney have been
vague and relatively silent on the issue.
The Obama administration has tried various routes, most of
which have provided limited success, with very little assistance going to the
average homeowner. Simply put, the
banks have too much power and without any teeth attached to the president’s
housing policies, lenders have had limited incentive to comply.
Romney, on the other hand, initially believed in a strategy
that would allow the market to correct itself by hitting rock bottom on it’s
own. Most would agree that this is
hardly a good option – especially for those homeowners who have continued paying
their mortgage on time, but still find themselves underwater and casualties –
not causes – of the housing crisis.
Since then, Romney has changed his tune a bit. Still, the only real difference between
his new approach and the presidents would be to abolish the Department of
Housing and Urban Development.
In a step to address the lack of focus on housing by the
presidential candidates, a group by the name of The Opportunity Agenda (opportunityagenda.org)
has composed an open letter to both candidates, titled: “The Home for Good
Campaign calls on President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney to offer
concrete solutions to the housing crisis”.
Essentially, the letter requests clarity from the candidates
on their plans for housing, as well as “bold action” to:
1. Stop needless foreclosures.
2. Expand affordable rental housing.
3. Revive a sustainable path to homeownership.
Further, the page offers a link to the Compact for HomeOpportunity, which outlines “What America Can Do to Stop Foreclosures and
Fulfill the American Dream”.
Regardless of which way you vote, this is a serious topic
that isn’t getting the attention it deserves. Housing drives the economy and until we find a way to fix
it, unemployment will remain high and real recovery will be difficult to
accomplish.
For those who think the recovery is underway due to the
recent increase in housing prices, don’t be fooled. Inventory is limited, due
to banks delaying the release of foreclosed homes back into the market. While the tactic might temporarily
increase prices, it does nothing to assist those who lost their homes, or still
stand to lose their homes, and is far from a long-term solution…
You can read the full Bloomberg News article, here.
Friday, September 14, 2012
Not Too Late For Mortgage Debt Relief Act Extension…
As the end of the year approaches, so does the expiration of
the Mortgage Debt Relief Act (MDRA) of 2007. The MDRA removes the capital gains tax penalty that would
normally be imposed on any forgiven debt — the difference between what was
originally owed and what the house sold for — on a primary residence sold in a
short sale.
The act is set to expire on the 31st of December
and should it not be extended, it will likely send the slowly recovering real
estate market – as well as the economy in general – back into a downward
spiral.
By having the act in place, it encourages people to work
with their lenders on short sales, without the fear of being hit with a huge
tax bill. Sure, they still might
be made responsible for a portion of the deficiency; but it will likely be far
less than the tax one would pay on the forgiven debt.
As noted in San Jose Mercury News:
“Housing advocates and lawmakers
are worried that the exemption will disappear just as thousands of homeowners
are receiving large amounts of mortgage debt relief from the nation's five
largest banks as part of a national settlement of foreclosure abuse
investigations. "The
expiration of that provision is a hidden time bomb," said Rep. Jim
McDermott, D-Wash.”
Unfortunately, we’re in the middle of an election year and
with all the other issues taking center stage, the extension of the MDRA is
being pushed to the back burner.
It doesn’t have to be that way.
Reach out to your elected representatives and let them know
how important it is that we extend the MDRA.
Friday, September 7, 2012
Can A Short Sale Be Removed From Your Credit Report?
This is a question we’re asked quite often and generally
speaking, no, you cannot remove a short sale from your credit report, if it’s
reported accurately.
A vice president with Bank of America once advised me that
lenders are required to report to the various credit agencies (Equifax,
Experian & TransUnion) accurately, in order to “preserve the integrity of
the credit reporting system”. I
know, I know – it’s hard to even type that with a straight face.
You can limit the damage to your score, if you’re able to
complete a short sale without going late – or at least, without becoming too
delinquent. The real damage comes
once you account is delinquent past 90 days. Regardless, negotiating how your short sale is reported has
never been a viable option.
However, I came across an interesting article this week,
discussing ways to challenge the derogatory reporting, even if you did complete
a short sale.
According to the San Jose Mercury News:
“Certified credit specialist Julie Macc says the moment
any negative or derogatory information is listed on a credit report, it will
affect a credit score anywhere from 60 to 160 points, so short sales and
foreclosure definitely hurt a client's credit score. However, it is possible to
remove a short sale or foreclosure from a credit report.
According to the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act,
everything reported on a client's credit report must be 100 percent accurate
and verifiable. At a recent meeting of members of the Silicon Valley Association
of Realtors, Macc indicated studies show 93 percent of consumers have
inaccurate information on their credit reports. You can challenge inaccurate
reporting in your credit report, she says.
"Are the dates and amounts reported correct? Is it
being reported as 'charged off' when payment was accepted for release of the
lien? Does the credit report reflect the account as being closed? Often the
account is being reported as open," says Macc.
If a borrower believes the mortgage loan servicer or
lender has made a mistake regarding their mortgage, under the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act, the borrower can file a Qualified Written Request
for information about all questionable fees, entries, documentation and a life
of loan history (all fees and payments ever made on your mortgage) from your
lender.
The lender has five days to acknowledge receipt of the
request and 21 days to provide the requested documentation or request an
extension with an explanation of why an extension is needed. Macc, who also
serves as a legal consultant on behalf of the Century Law Group, says to date,
the firm has never had a client whose lender has fully complied with the QWR,
or responded in the time set forth by the federal guidelines.
Consumers may file a complaint with the lender(s), and in
most cases against the three credit bureaus: Experian, TransUnion and Equifax.
If the lender does not respond, or refuses to comply with the borrower's QWR,
the borrower may take the matter to small claims court and sue the lender.“
So, it’s not as much a “negotiation” to remove the short
sale, but rolling the dice on a technicality. It could work though, since lenders regularly report
inaccurately and both they and the credit reporting agencies themselves are rarely
able to respond to/acknowledge anything within 21 days, let alone 5.
It’s an interesting tactic – one you can learn more about
here, at the mecurynews.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

